https://k5wiki.test.kerberos.org/wiki?action=history&feed=atom&title=Release_Meeting_Minutes%2F2011-07-19Release Meeting Minutes/2011-07-19 - Revision history2026-05-14T17:25:40ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.4https://k5wiki.test.kerberos.org/wiki?title=Release_Meeting_Minutes/2011-07-19&diff=3904&oldid=prevTomYu: New page: {{minutes|2011}} Jozsef Doczi, Will Fiveash, Thomas Hardjono, Sam Hartman, Greg Hudson, Jonathan Lin, Tom Yu ==IETF== ;Sam: Who will be there? [ not many? Shawn Emery will be there.] ;Tom...2011-08-01T19:24:54Z<p>New page: {{minutes|2011}} Jozsef Doczi, Will Fiveash, Thomas Hardjono, Sam Hartman, Greg Hudson, Jonathan Lin, Tom Yu ==IETF== ;Sam: Who will be there? [ not many? Shawn Emery will be there.] ;Tom...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{minutes|2011}}<br />
Jozsef Doczi, Will Fiveash, Thomas Hardjono, Sam Hartman, Greg Hudson, Jonathan Lin, Tom Yu<br />
<br />
==IETF==<br />
;Sam: Who will be there? [ not many? Shawn Emery will be there.]<br />
;Tom: DNS issues...<br />
;Sam: Camellia. PAD. Greg's OTP issue. IANA registration policies. Thomas Narten will talk about things that are hard. (balancing collision avoidance versus amount of review)<br />
;Tom: What harm is there from adopting Camellia?<br />
;Sam: Stephen Farrell will make it a high bar. It takes up time. Confuses implementors. Greg, what is the value of taking it through WG rather than through RFC Editor (independent submission)?<br />
;Greg: Technical review.<br />
;Sam: Regardless of which way... you will get more review.<br />
;Tom: Crypto hedge rationale.<br />
;Thomas: Hard to get WG to look at it.<br />
;Sam: Note interest in GCM etc. because they were new.</div>TomYu